Showing posts with label paintings. Show all posts
Showing posts with label paintings. Show all posts

Sunday, 18 May 2014

Transformations 1914-2014

I started a few weeks ago to work at the Canadian War Museum in Ottawa, Capitale, as an interpreter for the exhibit of paintings of the Canadian War Memorial Fund of Max Aitken Lord Beaverbrook.

Lord Beaverbrook who was the first Press Baron in London was immensely wealthy, a Canadian from New Brunswick, he moved to London and was elected to Parliament and became a Minister in the British Government. Canadians could do that then, since we were British Subjects and part of the Empire.

When the Great War started in August 1914, Canada was automatically at war and 10% of our population went to war some 650,000 men. We also produced the ammunition for Britain and for ourselves and supplied Britain with millions of tons of food to avoid famine in the British Isles.

Canadian Soldier called a Tommy, on his shoulder a red patch and a blue half moon, insignia indicating he was a Canadian Army soldier 14th Battalion, also on his sleeve a yellow bar indicating he was wounded in action. This poster was designed by Gunner Ross Wiggs of Montreal. In 1969 Wiggs described this cartoon as the humorous side of the Great War.


This enormous Canadian contribution needed to be remembered and so Lord Beaverbrook took it upon himself to set up a group of 116 artists who would be on the battlefields of the Western Front (Belgium-French border) to document the Canadian soldiers at war. Some 400 paintings were produced and they are now today at the National Gallery of Canada and at the Canadian War Museum. It is worth noting that the Government of Sir Robert Borden was not at all interested in documenting what Canadians were doing in Europe.

My job is to help visitors to the exhibit understand what they are looking at, explain who the painters were and how they got involved with the program, I also have to explain the different schools of painting and the evolution painters went through as part of their experience of the horrors of the Front. Something difficult for us to understand one hundred years later.

One exhibit (the other is called Witness, I will write about it later) Transformations features two artists of very different character and origins, one is Alexander Young Jackson better known as AY Jackson of the Group of Seven Fame, the other is the famous German Artist of the XXth Century Otto Dix. The two men were very different, Jackson was from Montreal and spent his life painting, at first he went to Europe, France and Italy to study the European style of painting and many of his landscapes were then in the Impressionist style favoured by Claude Monet.

Otto Dix was from Gera a small town near Dresden in Saxony. Born in a poor worker family, Dix loved the countryside and was troubled by the rapid changes brought upon by industrialisation. He was fascinated by the writings of Friedrich Nietzsche, he was also influenced by modern artist like Klimt, Van Gogh. By 1913 he was following the Futurist and Expressionist movements in painting, Ludwig Meidner with his dramatic apocalyptic paintings was a source of inspiration.

Of the two painters I find Dix far more complex than Jackson. There is a certain maturity in his paintings and his thinking totally lacking in Jackson who was painting, charming pictures to use his own words on his work of the period between 1882-1914.

Dix sought to depict the transformation of society through the violence done to the Earth and the countryside around him and equated this to the violence done to women. Mother Earth, women, regeneration, life death cycle is present in his paintings and sketches. Did Otto Dix oppose the war or the motives of going to war, that is not clear, he did say that he joined the German Army to experience death at a close range. Dix at age 22 was put in charge of a machine gun which at the time was a brand new weapon and could with its spray of bullets kill hundreds of men in a few minutes.

From 1914 onwards we see how his battlefield experience has affected-transformed him. He wants to believe in regeneration of life. Whereas Jackson who joined the Canadian Army will fight on the Front but is injured in 1915 convalescing in London he meets with Lord Beaverbrook who offers him the opportunity of returning to the Front not as a soldier but as an artist. Jackson will also meet with Paul Nash and will change gradually his style of painting to a more Surrealist and Symbolist Style leaving behind the earlier Impressionist style he followed. However Jackson made clear that he would not paint like Lismer or Varley depicting the horrors of war. He preferred to do landscapes trying to convey a message of desolation and emptiness created by the bombardment and battles.

Jackson presents a reflection on violence and on societies at war with each other, a more subtle approach to how he viewed the Great War. The landscapes shows trees like a chorus of Greek mourners, there is something terribly disturbing about the skeletons of trees where you should see green fields covered in flowers with great leafy trees, you see emptiness thus accurately portraying the violence of this first industrial war. In a sense I prefer the work of Canadian artist Frederick Varley 1881-1969 or Arthur Lismer 1885-1969 who have no such reticence to show things as they were and ask through their paintings direct often aggressive questions of the viewer. They also reflect as the years wore on the anger in Canada of Canadians who by 1918 wanted to know what this war was all about. Canada had 66,000 war dead and 175,000 gravely wounded, a very high social cost for a country with a population of only 7 million people at the time. In fact Canada had more war dead than the USA who joined the war in early 1918.

After the war both Jackson and Dix return home. AY Jackson is now an established artists and will help create the Group of Seven which will be active in Canada from 1919 to 1935, the McMichael Collection in Kleinburg north of Toronto is the repository of their collective work. In this sense Canada owes Lord Beaverbrook an immense debt, because of his idea to finance and promote Canadian artists, he helped Canadian painters and other artists to come of age and gain valuable experience which propelled forward Canadian art scene.

Dix not so lucky returns to a broken country, the German Empire has collapsed, the Kaiser left for exile in Holland, the economy is gripped by hipper inflation, millions of veterans are without money or work, many are horribly disfigured and maimed. On the German Art scene a new movement DaDaist or painting of the absurd is all the rage, Germans are searching for a way out in a climate of near Civil War. This is where the National Socialist Ideology will take root gradually, promising work, a stable economy, industrial development and to make Germany a great country again. The promise of work and social reform is seductive and crafted carefully by Hitler and the men around him. He promises the reform of Socialism without the excesses of Communism now all too apparent in Russia. Dix like many German artists will resist the Siren call of the Nazi Party. He becomes a professor at the Art Academy of Dresden a post he will occupy until 1933. As he becomes more and more famous he is setting himself up as a known opponent of Nazism and the ideology which sought to impose on German society one artistic style and one school of thought on Culture, Education, etc.

Otto Dix, Shell burst in battle,  

Things are not much better in Canada in 1919, socialist causes and Trade Unions are now everywhere, there is lack of work and inflation. Veterans are often left to fend for themselves or families are asked to care for them. The Borden Government is unable to answer the social demands  to rapidly changing country, also transformed by the Great War. The great Winnipeg General Strike will happen in May 1919. The Government of Sir Robert Borden panics fearing Bolchevism and orders the RCMP to shoot on the strikers. Canadians are asking what was this war all about and general dissatisfaction grips the Country. Borden a man of another age is completely overwhelmed by this new Canada, the old order he knew of the ruling class who dominated national discourse was gone.

The great Canadian War Memorial collection of Lord Beaverbrook is a burden for the Borden government who does not know what to do with 400 paintings depicting Canadians at war. Borden does not like them and tells his wife in a letter. They are put in the care of the National Gallery in a storage facility where they will remain for 90 years. The Museum to house them will never be built despite Lord Beaverbrook providing plans and drawings.

Despite this important artistic legacy Canadians will not know about their experience and officially we are told of the British, French and American contribution as if ours was not that important. Transformations the exhibit wants to set the tone and correct perceptions so that the Canadian public can see what our ancestors did and how the Great War forever changed Canada from a social point of view from rural to urban, women by the thousands joining the workforce giving them a new role and a new voice politically with the introduction of the vote in 1917 and for Canada political independence as a country.

This citation from Paul Nash who influenced the work of AY Jackson is appropriate for the Exhibit Transformations.
He wrote in a letter to his wife in November 1917; I am no longer an artist interested and curious, I am a messenger who will bring back word from the men who are fighting to those who want the war to go on for ever. Feeble, inarticulate, will be my message, but it will have a bitter truth, and may it burn their lousy souls.


A.Y. Jackson,  A Copse, evening 1918.  Beaverbrook Canadian War Art Collection.  



Saturday, 26 January 2013

Italian landscape painting in the 18th century

In the 18th century Rome and Italy was the centre of the Art World. The wealthy did the Grand Tour which involved as one of many destinations on this grand tour, Italy and Rome of course was a highlight, a must see, as we say today.  On this tour Greece was also a highlight but for different reasons. Rome and Naples was a centre for music, opera, painting, sculpture and all other forms of art.
Greece was the repository of  ethics, philosophy, democracy, ancient myths, learning and classical theatre.

Rome has always had in Western history a surreal, magical place, the child of Greece who grew up to out shine Greece.  Athens became the client of Rome, then had a long period of dormancy, Constantinople became the centre until its conquest by the Ottoman Turks but remained as Istanbul an Imperial Capital. Rome did go into a demise for about 1000 years until 1450 when with the returns of the Papacy from Avignon, the city is resurrected, re-assuming its Imperial grandeur.

Painters all flocked to Rome to study the techniques of the Italian masters like Tintoretto, Caravaggio, Titian, Veronese, Tiepolo. Most if not all French painters and painters of other countries like the Dutch, Germans and others flocked to Italy.

Playing with light and the clear/obscure shades of many Italian painters inspired them. The paintings are a romantic play on classical themes or on landscapes to inspire Europeans who travelled on the grand tour.

What I like about those paintings is that today some 250 years later you can still see these same scenes with little or no change at all. How often can you visit a place today and see the same undisturbed area
centuries later.

Paul Flandrin, View of the Villa Torlonia at Frascati.


Charles Rémond, View of the Basilica of Constantine from the Palatine Hill, Rome
This view of the Forum and the Ancient Basilica of Constantine is far more bucolic than today.
This majestic monument to Emperor Constantine as been stabilized by archeologists and the area behind it is built up now with the Via dei Fori Imperiali.

Hubert Robert painted this fabricated view of the Port of Ripetta. He was very clever at creating
pictures by putting famous buildings into his paintings inventing a scenery. His view on Paris is interesting he puts all the famous buildings in one frame as if they all look at each other on a piazza.
Here in this painting you have on the right the Senators Palace from the Campidoglio, the Pantheon which is not at all located on Via di Ripetta and look the two columns on each side of the Pantheon are taken from the formal entrance of Villa Borghese on Piazzale Flaminio. The Port of Ripetta no longer exist it disappeared in 1860 when Garibaldi had the embankment walls built in the Tiber River to prevent the annual winter floods of Rome. Via di Ripetta starts in Piazza Del Popolo, the port was located by the Ponte Cavour and Via Tomacelli. But it is nonetheless a beautifully romantic painting.


Finally this view of the Temple of the Sybil at Tivoli near Rome. This is probably a morning view because in the afternoon the sun sets behind these buildings to the right and they appear in a very different light then, more dark golden. Claude Vernet painted this scene in 1740 while in Rome and today it is the same nothing has changed. It is just as magical as ever.

All these painters made Italy famous and encouraged people to visit to this day.




Friday, 25 May 2012

Vernissage Van Gogh at the National Gallery of Canada


        Amandier


Last night was the Vernissage at the National Gallery of Canada of the new Van Gogh exhibit, the first in 25 years in Canada. There were lots of people, the great Hall was full, we had a glass of wine and enjoyed the piano music though it was a little hard to hear over the conversations. The Government of the Netherlands and Japan participated in the organization, it was explained that Van Gogh is very popular in Japan and he had collected nearly 400 Japanese prints between 1886-88. He was fascinated with Japanese wood block prints. Other museums in Amsterdam and in Toronto like the Royal Ontario Museum also provided works, many never seen before in public, taken out of storage. I also like the etchings from which is took inspiration, beautifully detailed. The exhibit shows the different techniques he used from Horizontal lines, zooming in on a subject, close-up details, playing with perspective, push and pull and strong diagonals. You can see it all in this exhibit which is rare given that usually museums only have a few of his paintings. The Exhibit is called Van Gogh up close and yes, what I saw reflects the theme.
Iris in the Collection of the National Gallery of Canada

The poster of the exhibit is the painting Amandier or Almond blossom, Van Gogh chose the blossom of the almond tree, a member of the rose family, to celebrate the joyous occasion- the birth of his brother Theo's son, his nephew- and as a symbol of new life. I really like that painting in particular.
Others I liked are Lavender, on loan from the Museum of Otterlo, comes from a short trip he took to the South of France where he painted View of Saintes-Maries-de-la-Mer. You can almost smell the lavender field.
Lavender fields in Saintes-Maries-de-la-Mer

Roses and Sunflowers, on loan from the Kunsthalle in Mannheim. Sunflowers return frequently in Van Gogh paintings, a Christian emblem of Faith. For the artist it symbolized companionship and gratitude. Iris, which is part of the collection of the National Gallery of Canada, a popular motif in the Dutch still-life tradition, the iris also featured in the Japanese woodblock prints that Van Gogh studied.
Auberge Ravoux today in Auvers-sur-Oise

Van Gogh had a short life and a tragic one, born in 1853 in Zundert, a small village of the Brabant in the south of the Netherlands and died by his own hand in 1890 in Auvers-sur Oise, North of Paris.
There was a few details about his life, he did a little travel between the Netherlands, Belgium, England and France, he was a lay preacher, tried to become a full time preacher but failed, too excentric apparently. Many of his exhibits he organized in small Café's and local restaurants where he lived. His brother Theo who was an art dealer in Paris supported him financially all his life and was at his side when he died. Van Gogh did spend some time in a Sanatorium in Saint-Rémy-de-Provence and contrary to popular Hollywood belief he only cut-off the lobe of his ear not the ear itself. A tormented soul, who lived in poverty and who left us a wonderful gift, without his realizing it he became immortal.

In closing let's not forget that our National Museums are all struggling financially with little to no help from the current Government. It is up to the public, all of us to strongly support our Museums. This exhibit on Van Gogh is at the National Gallery of Canada on Sussex Drive in Ottawa until 3 September 2012.








Sunday, 13 December 2009

Roman Painting in the ancient world





A beautiful exhibit of 100 works of Roman decorative paintings is on show currently at the Scuderie Del Quirinale (stables of the Quirinale Palace). The Scuderie built in 1722 by Pope Clement, is a palace of brick and stone across the square from the Quirinale Palace to house the coaches and horses of the Popes. The ground floor was used to park the coaches and equipment, the second floor was for the horses stalls, a gigantic staircase was especially built to allow the horses to walk up to their stalls, the third floor was for staff lodgings. The Scuderie was built on top of the ruins of the imposing Temple of the Egyptian Goddess Serapis.
The view from the top of the Quirinale hill is beautiful, in 1870 the new Government of United Italy confiscated the palace and the stables from the Pope and used the Quirinale as a Royal Palace for the Savoy family and the King. Today the Quirinale is the Presidential Palace of the Italian Republic and the Scuderie was refurbished 10 years ago and turned into a museum.

This exhibit of Roman paintings before 79 AD is very complete and gives a very good idea of how Romans decorated their houses, temples and public buildings. The 100 example of paintings represent the best preserved and the most detailed of this art form. After 79 AD (time of Emperor Titus) and the eruption of the volcano Vesuvius which buried the towns of Pompeii and Herculanum, paintings in houses was still popular however today little has come down to us. The ancient world was a coloured world, where historical, mythological events but also aspects of the nature and the daily life, were reproduced using realism and poetry.
All public monuments, statues and marbles were nearly always coloured: white marble was always inserted within a complex chromatic scheme. Sculptures and stuccoes were lively and charmingly painted.

Nevertheless, it has become commonplace to identify the “classic” with the transparency of white marble. Time cancels colours, destroys wood, washes and cleans so that all that is left is white marble and white stone. Of paintings and decorations in the houses and monuments very little is left and practically nothing painted on wood remains today.
This is why it is difficult to imagine the ancient world as a coloured world. The discovery of Pompeii and Hercolanum in the middle of the seventeenth century could have changed this attitude but under the influence of a classicist theory the ancient world has continued to be imagined as a white world.
This is very far from a historical reality: for Romans as for Greeks before them, real art was painting not sculpture: this is what this show is about.

Roman Imperial Painting is an exhibition that documents the development of roman painting through the centuries: born out Greek art, it will in turn be a model for the following centuries. At the Scuderie the visitor will be able to appreciate the quality of roman art in its highest form as well as the close but distant relationship between ancient and modern art: from the Renaissance to Impressionism all we know is linked to the ancient world.

Roman painters, for instance, like our modern impressionists, used a fast painting technique, in spots, with touches of color based on a subjective interpretation. Not only is this technique already present in roman times, but the qualitative level of some frescoes seems to anticipate artistic solutions of the 1500's and through to the 1800's.
But ancient art also diverged from modern techniques: we can see this in the spatial conception of a roman painter. Romans were not interested in the system of linear perspective which will be “invented” by Italian architects in the first decades of the 1400's: Roman distributed objects freely in space, without rigid perspective constrictions. In such a way there is no fusion between space and objects, who seem to be flanking one another, or one over the other, leaving an impression of instability.

The exhibition will first focus on landscapes, views of villas and rural sanctuaries populated by little figures that remember the Neapolitean presepi (crèches), followed by a choice of imagery from Greek mythology: Amore and Psiche, Polifemo and Galatea, Ercole and Telefo, Perseo and Andromeda just to name a few. But the exhibition will also highlight scenes of daily life, erotic images and still lives which abounded in roman imagery.

The Romans conquered Greece around 90 BC and turned it into a province of Rome called Achaia, however Greece was the mythical homeland of Rome and many of its most famous sons like Julius Caesar and his nephew Augustus claim direct Greek descent, through the heros of Troy. So the cultural influence of Greece on Roman art and education was enormous.

The Greeks loved art and poetry and decorated their houses with wall paintings a bit like we do today. The Romans wanted more, taste was for lavish and garish, bold bright colours, art was fine but it was more important to tell visitors how much you had spent on decorating the house. This was expressed by using expensive colors and elaborate themes. Some color shades like black or purple or red where extremely expensive, so if you wanted to impress you did a whole wall or walls, that way your visitors would be impressed with how filthy rich you were. A bit crass if you asked me but hey, that was the fashion.

Pompeii was a city of the new rich and many of them were also freed slaves or Liberati, the houses and their decoration reflect the new wealth. It was fashionable to paint the walls of your dining room black because it absorbed the light from outside and the heat of the sun. You added on top motifs of temples and deities or pastoral landscapes to comlete the whole. Garlands, cornucopias, dwarfs or satyrs or erotic scenes. There was also no division between private and public space, it was an unknown concept to the Romans, a house was not just the place you lived in, it was also a place to receive clients and visitors from dawn to dusk, so it was important to decorate the walls as a reflection of self.


Portraits are separate chapter. Visitors can admire a direct comparison of roman portraits on fresco, mosaic or on glass, unearthed in Italy, with the most celebrated roman portraits from the Egyptian oasis of El Fayyum near Cairo.

It was the fashion to have one's portrait made, usually at an age when you would be youthful looking. This portrait was then used after you died for your funeral, mixing beauty and virtue, the Romans believed that beautiful people, physically handsome people had beautiful souls, it went hand in hand. Ugly people were of course bad people, they had dark souls. It was also interesting to see that male figures in the paintings are always a bronzed skin color, where as women are a pale white color, pale color was a sign of weakness. Women are also shown with nice plump behinds, this was much prized in Roman culture, a big ass meant beauty and fertility, very good qualities in the Roman world.

A great exhibit and i am glad I saw it, the bookshop of the Scuderie is also very nice with lots of wonderful books on art and history.